A
84522 407
reply
will show that the injury
with
чинь is not confined to one
have had no
hesitation in promising
Copy
that
4:17.
Nort
to
Sor
bring the whole matter clearly be fore
H. Tmi's fort-
It does not appear that useful and is served by the disabling
stipulations of
Sany
the act in question, while
the scrious nature of
021
British interesty a
question.
the injury inflicted
shipping is beyond
I venture to hope therefore
that some legislative remedy may
provided in a
short period.
be
I have directed Mr. Pedder.
to lose no time in forwarding direct to the Foreign Office the more detailed statement who he proffers.
H.R.
The Chinese Passenger's Act. 1855.
British Consulate
Amoy
Dic: 20.1869.
The Chinese Passenger's Act 1855 wh
was passed for the regulation of
Engaged in what
Vessels
was called the "Coolie trade"
was so worded as to include Vessels Engaged
in the ordinary general trade between
Ports in Clima
a
those in the British
Straits Possessions, Java, Manila xc. xc. the the Passenger traffic ish formes a
wh
portion of the trade of these Vessels bears no more resemblance to the "Coolie Irade. than that between Liverpool & New York bears to it.
The British Vessels engaged in this
Sir R. Alcock K. C. B.
local
2
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.